{"id":11285,"date":"2011-04-19T10:23:14","date_gmt":"2011-04-19T10:23:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.access-info.org\/s2-using-the-right-to-know\/c6-access-for-rights\/11285"},"modified":"2018-11-13T10:13:33","modified_gmt":"2018-11-13T09:13:33","slug":"data-retention-not-effective","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.access-info.org\/es\/2011-04-19\/data-retention-not-effective\/","title":{"rendered":"data retention not effective"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 class=\"PRHeader\" style=\"margin-left: 0cm;\">Insufficient info undermines EU claims on value of data retention<\/h1>\n<h2>18 EU states fail to provide full statistics on use of personal data in fighting crime<\/h2>\n<p><em>18 April 2011, Madrid<\/em> &#8211; There are serious risks associated  with the massive invasion of personal privacy required by the EU&#8217;s 2006  Data Retention Directive whilst there is no strong evidence that is an  effective instrument against crime according to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alexander-alvaro.de\/archives\/1904\/test-2\" target=\"_blank\">leaked version of an EU report<\/a> to be lauched officially today.<\/p>\n<p>  <!--more-->  <\/p>\n<p>The leaked version of the Commission\u2019s report claims that it\u2019s \u201cevaluation has demonstrated that data retention is a valuable tool for criminal justice systems and for law enforcement in the EU\u201d but fails to provide sufficient proof to substantiate that. Indeed, the report concedes that \u201cmost EU member states do not keep statistics on what type of evidence proved crucial in securing convictions or acquittals\u201d and so relies more on anecdotal and \u201cillustrative\u201d examples.<a class=\"jce_file\" title=\"Read more...\" href=\"http:\/\/www.access-info.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011_04_18_Data_Retention_Insufficient_Statistics.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"> Read more&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Insufficient info undermines EU claims on value of data retention 18 EU states fail to provide full statistics on use of personal data in fighting crime 18 April 2011, Madrid &#8211; There are serious risks associated with the massive invasion of personal privacy required by the EU&#8217;s 2006 Data Retention Directive whilst there is no strong evidence that is an effective instrument against crime according to the leaked version of an EU report to be lauched officially today.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[133],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-a4r"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.access-info.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.access-info.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.access-info.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.access-info.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.access-info.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11285"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.access-info.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11285\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17737,"href":"https:\/\/www.access-info.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11285\/revisions\/17737"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.access-info.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.access-info.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.access-info.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}