OPENING UP DECISION MAKING

RESEARCH SHOWS THERE IS A SERIOUS LACK OF TRANSPARENCY WHEN TRYING TO KNOW HOW DECISIONS ARE TAKEN IN EUROPE

THIS IS WHAT WE FOUND, AND WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE

ONLY 40% OF KEY DECISION-MAKING INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

The map below explores the different obstacles we’ve encountered accessing information on decision-making processes in 12 European jurisdictions.

  • Information available:
  • 0-20%
  • 21-40%
  • 41-60%
  • 61-80%
  • 81-100%

We analysed 5 decision making proccess. It was impossible to access most of the information. There is a serious problem when it comes to contacts with lobbyists.
Find out all about it here.

We analysed 7 decision making process. Access to information was partailly possible. There is a serious problem with record keeping: one third of the information requested was not held by the public authority.
Find out all about it here.

We analysed 15 requests done throught AsktheEU.org.
Find out all about it here.

We analysed 3 decision making process. There is a lack of record keeping of minutes of meetings.
Find out all about it here.

We analysed 4 decision making process. There are serious problem with disclosing information about participants in meetings, including name of public officials, companies or lobbyists.
Find out all about it here.

We analysed 3 decision making process. There is a clear breach of the Law: Authorities failed to process most of the access to information requests.
Find out all about it here.

We analysed 3 decision making process. Relevant documents for understanding decision-making processes are not proactively available.
Find out all about it here.

We analysed 6 decision making process. It is very worrying that there is no information available at all.
Find out all about it here.

We analysed 3 decision making process. Key information on decision making processes, such as minutes of meetings and documents provided by lobbyists, was not proactively published.
Find out all about it here.

We analysed 3 decision making process. Relevant documents to understand decision-making processes are not proactively available.
Find out all about it here.

We analysed 4 decision making process. There is a lack of record keeping of dates, places and minutes of meetings.
Find out all about it here.

We analysed 5 decision making process. Access to the minutes of meetings and documents submitted by lobbyist is denied in most of the cases because of the cost of compiling exception.
Find out all about it here.

THE FINDINGS: MAIN CHALLENGES FOR TRANSPARENCY

Europe's Access to Information laws permit requests for decision-making information

What we have found

However, an analysis of these 12 European laws has told us there is no obligation to record minutes of meetings held as part of decision-making processes.

Insufficient levels of proactive publication of information is impeding participation

What we have found

European countries are not proactively publishing who public officials meet, reasons justifying their decisions, nor records created regarding policy and legislation.

Information released through FOI requests is not enough to ensure accountability

What we have found

European countries are abusing the use of certain exceptions to deny access to documents, such as the protection of privacy when it comes to government and public officials.

LEARN MORE ABOUT EUROPE’S
RTI LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEARN MORE ABOUT PROACTIVE
PUBLICATION IN EUROPE
LEARN MORE ABOUT DECISION-MAKING FOI REQUESTS
LEARN MORE: DOWNLOAD THE FINDINGS IN FULL!

RECOMMENDATIONS: TOWARDS OPEN DECISION MAKING

  • Transparency applies to all

All public bodies which bear responsibility for decision making should fall under the scope of the access to information laws.

  • Create records

Public authorities have a duty to document information around decision-making processes that is essential to ensure public participation and scrutiny, as well as for the historical record.

  • Improve proactive publication requirements

Public authorities and representatives should be obliged to keep records and proactively publish information such as their agendas, minutes of meetings, third-party documents (submitted as part of or outside public consultations) and information justifying decisions taken.

  • Reduce time taken to make information publically available

Prompt responses to requests are essential to facilitate potential participation in decision-making processes. This also counts when responding to appeals.

  • Apply exceptions narrowly to information related to decision making

Exceptions should always be applied narrowly and always taking into account any overriding public interest in full (or partial) disclosure of information.

TWEET YOUR SUPPORT!
LEARN MORE: KEEP READING!